War, nuclear
weapons, and “the most dangerous place on the planet” were all on the agenda
last Friday when retired Army Colonel and current CBS national security
consultant Dr. Jeffery McCausland delivered a lecture titled, “Back to the
Future: Battlefield Weapons in South Asia.”
The 45-minute talk addressed the
contentious relationship between India and Pakistan, and Pakistan’s proliferation
of “tactical nuclear weapons,” or nuclear weapons used in short-range on the military
battlefield. According to McCausland, these developments have occurred in order
to deter India from acting aggressively towards Pakistan.
While these developments have manifested
for peaceful ends, McCausland warned of the prospects of these weapons falling
into the hands of terrorist groups in Pakistan, in addition to arguing that
their presence heightens prospects of an arms race and lowers the threshold for
larger-scale nuclear escalation and war — making this “the most dangerous
border in the world.”
“If
we have a nuclear war,” McCausland explained to the group of about 50 students
and professors, “I firmly believe it will be in South-East Asia.”
McCausland likened the relationship
to US-Soviet Cold War relations, and said the United States’ experience with
such conflict has compelled American and Pakistani officials to participate in informal
discussions on how to avoid miscalculations that could lead to “catastrophic consequences.”
McCausland stressed that this is a
problem that the United States has a direct interest in, explaining that an
aggressive step taken by either Pakistan or India could trigger action from
various other nations, eventually reaching the United States.
But, according to McCausland, this
problem “can only be managed, and never solved.”
Though McCausland did not express hope
for ending the problem, he did offer paths to avoid escalation, including encouraging
inter-nation discussions with enhanced transparency, constructing arms control
treaties, and developing any processes that slow, and illustrate the consequences
of, proliferation.
No comments:
Post a Comment